Text
A Quest for Restitutio ad Integrum: The Enforcement of Transnational Non-Conviction-Based Confiscation Orders in the United Nations, European Union, Australian, and Indonesian Legal Frameworks
The present research compares and critically examines the enforcement of transnational non-conviction-based confiscation (NCBC) orders in the United Nations, European Union, Australian, and Indonesian legal frameworks utilising comparative legal and document analyses. The results serve as a reference for regulating a fair and effective framework for transnational NCBC enforcement in Indonesian law. Research findings are presented following these themes of comparison: the nature of NCBC, justification for NCBC, adaptive response conceptualisation, mechanism facilitating transnational NCBC enforcement and its practice, and procedural safeguards in the transnational enforcement stage. It is concluded that the relevant United Nations, European Union, and Australian legal frameworks can serve as a benchmark for transnational NCBC enforcement in Indonesia, specifically as regards the norm formulation of NCBC, international cooperation for effectuating transnational NCBC orders, and the corresponding procedural safeguards to ensure fairness. However, the research findings indicate that practices of transnational NCBC enforcement in these jurisdictions have yet to generate significant references for empirical effectiveness benchmarking. Furthermore, this thesis discovers crucial implications for the theories of adaptive response and justification for NCBC. Lastly, reconceptualisation of the Indonesian NCBC regime and proposals for reforming the Criminal Assets Confiscation Bill and the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act are commended.
| B017157 | 364.1323 Vol q(fw) | Perpustakaan Hukum Daniel S. Lev | Tersedia |
Tidak tersedia versi lain